IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds

Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by TriinT on Thursday August 27, 2009 @08:39PM (#790473)

True. But would it be too far-fetched to claim that the quality of a website / blog can be indirectly measured by the quality of its comments? A quality blog should not tolerate certain comments which are more appropriate for YouTube.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by sho on Thursday August 27, 2009 @08:57PM (#790492)

Sigh, when you find the answer to that question, let me know ...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by TriinT on Thursday August 27, 2009 @09:45PM (#790540)

They will never sell Chanel No. 5 in gas stations because it would cheapen it. Likewise, a blog that tolerates retarded trollish comments looks cheap. If I were one of the IBM scientists who worked on that project, I would hate to have my work publicized by a blog as distasteful as Gizmodo.

Call me elitist if you will. BTW, my question was rhetorical.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds by sho on Friday August 28, 2009 @05:50PM (#792358)

If you're elitist, it's in a good way. I agree.

[ Parent | on HN ]