News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The desktop and the developer by tomp on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @08:12AM (#7772106)
I only used Linux for a short while and that was when Ubuntu Unity was a very new thing, so I assume it got better now, but then it couldn't possibly compare to OSX virtual desktops; it was usable, but very annoying.

Having said that, I need a terminal (iTerm2), a browser, and a packet manager (homebrew), and I'm happy. I assume build issues would happen on Linux too, and they would probably be harder to resolve (more versions of the OS).

Re:The desktop and the developer by aerique on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @08:28AM (#7772179)
One of the nice things about Linux desktops is that you're not tied to the default window manager like you are in Windows and OSX. While Linux distros might have a default window manager (like your Unity example for Ubuntu) it is still easy to switch.

This allows developers to experiment with different paradigms with regards to the GUI, see for example the popularity of tiling WMs on Linux. (i3 has my preference, others swear by xmonad).

I know it is possible to change window managers for Windows and OSX as well but the experience is just not the same.

Re:The desktop and the developer by collyw on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @11:08AM (#7772933)
Totally agree.

I used to love KDE, then they messed it up with KDE 4. Moved to Ubuntu / Gnome. Then Ubuntu screwed it up when they made it all Unity based. Screw that, I was happy working the way I was without to much shiny. Now using XFCE, and its refreshingly simple.

Re:The desktop and the developer by platz on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @03:19PM (#7774611)
Fan of i3 as well. People talk about tmux and I just shrug; it's built in!
Re:The desktop and the developer by eterps on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @05:25PM (#7775318)
Tmux is built in to i3?
Re:The desktop and the developer by wting on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @06:18PM (#7775587)
He prefers a tiling windows manager at the application level rather than within tmux.

People make a big deal out of tmux's split screens, but my workflow is much more flexible with xmonad and GNU screen (with the caveat that it requires more upfront).

Re:The desktop and the developer by mreiland on Wednesday May 21, 2014 @04:39PM (#7780634)
love me some i3 :)
Re:The desktop and the developer by mreiland on Wednesday May 21, 2014 @04:38PM (#7780632)
roughly the same here. I've always been a fan of XFCE, but preferred KDE until KDE4. And I just re-installed KDE 3 days ago, still don't like it.

I switched over to XFCE for a while, until finally settling on i3. I'm perfectly happy with i3, and even if KDE pulled their heads out of their butts, I doubt I would go back.

Re:The desktop and the developer by mreiland on Friday May 30, 2014 @03:34PM (#7823549)
ha, just realized my typo. I re-installed KDE 4, not KDE 3. I liked KDE 3 :)
Re:The desktop and the developer by pyre on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @09:14AM (#7772338)
> I assume build issues would happen on Linux too, and they would probably be harder to resolve (more versions of the OS).

That's a fairly large assumption to make based on your admitted lack of experience.

Re:The desktop and the developer by dllthomas on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @08:20AM (#7772144)
Unity is not most people's Linux experience, and it's easy to swap in something better if it doesn't fit your needs (which, so far as I'm aware, is very much not the case on Mac). Given that the parent mentioned Debian, I don't think they were raving about Unity.
Re:The desktop and the developer by cmiles74 on Tuesday May 20, 2014 @08:23AM (#7772157)
IMHO, Unity is not the strongest contender for a full, desktop environment on Linux. Both Gnome and KDE provide an environment that I find more comparable to Windows and OSX.