Re:Number of founders - statistics
by dfranke on Thursday November 08, 2007 @12:54PM
(#77535)
Unfortunately I think the sample bias that you mentioned makes this useless as any sort of statistical study. The one useful result I'd take from this is "succeeding as a single founder is possible".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Number of founders - statistics
by fauigerzigerk on Thursday November 08, 2007 @12:58PM
(#77538)
Exactly. And maybe one non statistical result as well: A significant number of very successful people _believed_ that it was possible, otherwise they wouldn't have tried to go it alone.
Re:Number of founders - statistics
by greendestiny on Thursday November 08, 2007 @04:22PM
(#77642)
Five times as many must have believed they needed cofounders. Either way I still think the take home message can be that successful single founder companies aren't an insignificant bizarro event.
Useless for an academic study, but great if you are a decision maker and need quick insight with incomplete data.
Very cool. Sometimes though, i think this is an ambiguous topic. There doesnt seem to be a strict definition of a founder?
Ian
I assume that in this context, founders are the people whose names show up on the incorporation filing.
agreed: almost useless as a guide for prospective founders unless it takes into account the statistics for ventures that _failed_. For this reason I would be more interested in the stats for ycombinator funded companies that either succeeded or threw in the towel.