News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Number of founders - statistics by dfranke on Thursday November 08, 2007 @12:54PM (#77535)
Unfortunately I think the sample bias that you mentioned makes this useless as any sort of statistical study. The one useful result I'd take from this is "succeeding as a single founder is possible".
Re:Number of founders - statistics by fauigerzigerk on Thursday November 08, 2007 @12:58PM (#77538)
Exactly. And maybe one non statistical result as well: A significant number of very successful people _believed_ that it was possible, otherwise they wouldn't have tried to go it alone.
Re:Number of founders - statistics by greendestiny on Thursday November 08, 2007 @04:22PM (#77642)
Five times as many must have believed they needed cofounders. Either way I still think the take home message can be that successful single founder companies aren't an insignificant bizarro event.
Re:Number of founders - statistics by breck on Thursday November 08, 2007 @12:58PM (#77537)
Useless for an academic study, but great if you are a decision maker and need quick insight with incomplete data.
Re:Number of founders - statistics by pumper on Thursday November 08, 2007 @03:34PM (#77616)
Very cool. Sometimes though, i think this is an ambiguous topic. There doesnt seem to be a strict definition of a founder?

Ian

Re:Number of founders - statistics by dfranke on Thursday November 08, 2007 @03:41PM (#77622)
I assume that in this context, founders are the people whose names show up on the incorporation filing.
Re:Number of founders - statistics by hollerith on Sunday November 11, 2007 @04:07PM (#78479)
agreed: almost useless as a guide for prospective founders unless it takes into account the statistics for ventures that _failed_. For this reason I would be more interested in the stats for ycombinator funded companies that either succeeded or threw in the towel.