News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chinese Government Will Invest CNY20 Billion to Promote IPv6 by DiabloD3 on Tuesday April 29, 2014 @10:24PM (#7671244)
I wish the US would spend this much to promote IPv6.
Re:Chinese Government Will Invest CNY20 Billion to Promote IPv6 by briandh on Wednesday April 30, 2014 @12:01AM (#7671540)
On top of what wmf said, with whatever government investment has or has not already been made, the U.S. has the fourth highest* IPv6 adoption by percentage of requests as of Dec 2013 [1]. That is double what it was just six months prior [id].

Moreover, I doubt the US has as pressing a need to stave of address space exhaustion as do developing countries like China with rapidly expanding internet uptake.

*biased by Akamai's usage rates from country to country, of course

[1] http://www.networkcomputing.com/networking/ipv6-adoption-her...?

Re:Chinese Government Will Invest CNY20 Billion to Promote IPv6 by wmf on Tuesday April 29, 2014 @11:01PM (#7671346)
Why? Japan spent a lot of effort on IPv6 and what did it get them?
Re:Chinese Government Will Invest CNY20 Billion to Promote IPv6 by coderzach on Tuesday April 29, 2014 @11:01PM (#7671347)
Why? To get widespread ipv6 support, I'd suppose.
Re:Chinese Government Will Invest CNY20 Billion to Promote IPv6 by kiallmacinnes on Wednesday April 30, 2014 @05:22AM (#7672312)
IPv6 adoption on its own is pretty meaningless.. I suspect it had more to do with economics than tech.

This is total guesswork.. But here goes.. Japan likley invested heavily in IPv6 because their economy is very tech driven, the risks of running out of IPv4 or even being viewed as "behind" were likely the driving factors IMO

Re:Chinese Government Will Invest CNY20 Billion to Promote IPv6 by illumen on Wednesday April 30, 2014 @04:55AM (#7672224)
Cheap gigabit internet for all?
Re:Chinese Government Will Invest CNY20 Billion to Promote IPv6 by kiallmacinnes on Wednesday April 30, 2014 @05:18AM (#7672299)
I'm not sure IPv6 had anything to do with the cheap or gigabit... Maybe the "for all"... But even that's a stretch :)