News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The latest chapter for the self-driving car: mastering ci... by pkulak on Monday April 28, 2014 @01:27PM (#7661463)
I remember hearing that debris is a very hard problem that Google hasn't figured out quite yet. They can detect it just fine, but they can't tell if it's safe to run over or the car should swerve to avoid it. I think they said that currently they monitor other cars and use what they do to determine what they should do, but that obviously won't work if every car is a robot.
Re:The latest chapter for the self-driving car: mastering ci... by stormbrew on Monday April 28, 2014 @01:44PM (#7661606)
If every car was a robot they'd just avoid everything and the other cars would swarm around the object and the cars avoiding it. A lot of the rules of the road are designed to narrow the number of things a driver has to focus on while remaining safe.
Re:The latest chapter for the self-driving car: mastering ci... by ForHackernews on Monday April 28, 2014 @01:31PM (#7661499)
As a stopgap, could the car just decelerate/stop and loudly alert the human driver, "Hey, you handle this"
Re:The latest chapter for the self-driving car: mastering ci... by gfodor on Monday April 28, 2014 @02:28PM (#7661925)
Unfortunately the thing to think about here is that as these things become more mainstream, there will be less people who are even skilled enough to control a car. So in the long run, if the system works well, any part of the design that relies upon human intervention is doomed. Ultimately your stopgap would become the equivalent of giving the wheel to the child in the backseat: more dangerous than just letting the computer do its best.
Re:The latest chapter for the self-driving car: mastering ci... by magicalist on Monday April 28, 2014 @04:17PM (#7662669)
On the other hand, it will be best case a decade or two before these things are out on the road en masse and even then only the youngest drivers wouldn't have gained many hours of driving experience. Meanwhile, in that time both automated car and sensor tech will have advanced quite a bit. It's only been a decade since that first DARPA challenge and five years since google started their project, after all.
Re:The latest chapter for the self-driving car: mastering ci... by mindslight on Monday April 28, 2014 @02:12PM (#7661811)
For consumer use (as opposed to an experimental vehicle), this is never an option. Even if you assume the person in the car is (present, of-age, licensed, awake, sober), the context switch of promptly having to drive on a busy road after hours/days/months of not having driven would be terrible.
Re:The latest chapter for the self-driving car: mastering ci... by Schwolop on Monday April 28, 2014 @07:29PM (#7663842)
Or they invest in a mechanical turk "supervisory remote driver" system.
Re:The latest chapter for the self-driving car: mastering ci... by 15characterlimi on Monday April 28, 2014 @02:44PM (#7662034)
Probably not a great idea to stop on the highway.
Re:The latest chapter for the self-driving car: mastering ci... by genericone on Monday April 28, 2014 @06:55PM (#7663679)
In a driver-less future, all cars communicate their intents to other nearby cars, stopping on a highway will be as safe as pulling over on a shoulder is today. It will feel dangerous, and it will be unsettling knowing cars are passing you by at speed, but the driver-less aspect of all cars ensures a high degree of safety.

That would be the result in the long term. But in this transition period TO driverless cars, I agree that stopping on the highway in your driver-less car is a big no-no.

Re:The latest chapter for the self-driving car: mastering ci... by icebraining on Tuesday April 29, 2014 @04:36AM (#7665728)
I believe car-to-car communication and auto-slowing-down based on that will come much sooner than driverless cars (US regulators are already talking about making V2V communications mandatory by 2017), so by the time the first driverless cars are sold, it'll probably be reasonably safe to slow down on the highway.