Re:Japanese railway operator to license maglev tech to US fo...
by ekianjo on Saturday April 12, 2014 @10:49AM
(#7577967)
Did you even read my comment ? Jets will go WHERE the maglev trains won't, even if it's not that far.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Japanese railway operator to license maglev tech to US fo...
by melling on Saturday April 12, 2014 @12:52PM
(#7578355)
You are being a bit vague. If I want to travel 60 miles, I'm not going to get on a jet. Do I want to get on a jet to travel 200 miles? What exact use case are you trying to describe? Also consider, for example, that a 777 needs a big airport.
Re:Japanese railway operator to license maglev tech to US fo...
by russum on Saturday April 12, 2014 @04:13PM
(#7579020)
This reminds me how once several years ago I had to fly MKE -> ORD -> LHR where the distance between MKE and ORD is about 70 miles. The MKE -> ORD flight was full by the way and it took ridiculous 2 hours to get there (from boarding to leaving the plane). I think I did it because the direct flight was several hundred $ extra and I happened to be in MKE area anyway.
Re:Japanese railway operator to license maglev tech to US fo...
by ekianjo on Sunday April 13, 2014 @07:16AM
(#7580975)
All these scenarios don't matter because wherever you are going most of the time you won't have anything BUT a jet and not a maglev train to bring you there (because it will only connect 2 cities to each other, and you'll never map out the whole territory with maglev train lines due to their prohibitive cost). Unless you want to take you car.