News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MLB.com is using my Google Analytics code by trustfundbaby on Wednesday March 26, 2014 @11:10PM (#7478347)
I don't see any reason for the guy to lie. He could just have not responded, or quietly changed the code, but he came to the blog and posted a publicly viewable comment about it ... maybe his diagnosis is wrong and something different is happening, but I'm very willing to believe it was an honest mistake given the circumstances.
Re:MLB.com is using my Google Analytics code by ternaryoperator on Thursday March 27, 2014 @03:01AM (#7479006)
I don't think he's lying, but I do think he's mistaken. They probably do generate random codes, but this was not one of them. It looks/smells like a copy/paste.

That aside, though, why not just create a different Google Analytics account and use that one consistently for testing?

Re:MLB.com is using my Google Analytics code by deletes on Thursday March 27, 2014 @01:50AM (#7478843)
This is exactly the reason they responded. By changing the code quietly, they would implicate themselves. An official PR statement like this is obligatory.

What is more probable, that they a lying, or that the random generator generated not a single code that matched, which is very(!) improbable by itself, but two codes that belong to the same account, generated at the same iteration.

Re:MLB.com is using my Google Analytics code by paulgb on Thursday March 27, 2014 @05:24AM (#7479329)
This is not an official PR statement, it's an engineer responding at 11 PM (MLB is based on the east coast) with the information he/she had available. I don't think there's an intent to decieve here, just a mistaken guess of the probabilities involved. Hanlon's razor applies.
Re:MLB.com is using my Google Analytics code by glneo on Tuesday April 01, 2014 @08:59PM (#7512892)
He has no idea that his team is a bunch of lazy outsourcers. He knows, he is just confused.
Re:MLB.com is using my Google Analytics code by NicoJuicy on Thursday March 27, 2014 @03:55AM (#7479116)
Yeah, it could be their CI doesn't generate random codes voor javascript code or something...