News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:BLAKE2: “Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger” Than MD5 by dredmorbius on Saturday March 22, 2014 @03:06AM (#7448116)
I think I may have overstated my case ;-)

I've taken the opportunity to look up how rainbow tables are used, and in practice, what are constructed are rainbows of likely hits, as well as exploitation of crytographic weaknesses in the MD5 algorithm. So, no, it's not the total address space, but, say, for keywords in multiple languages or known revealed passwords (of which the most common give you tremendous amounts of access -- the top 10 and 100 passwords will access many systems, and lists of millions are now available, for which rainbow tables are easily constructed). And the collision problem also remains.

As for assembling large amounts of storage: with distributed systems, whether on bare metal, cloud systems, or botnets, it's possible to aggregate terrebytes of memory (not merely on-disk storage) for quite modest budgets within reach of a company or moderate-high-net-worth evil genious, let alone a state actor. For commodity x86 servers, high-end memory now looks to be ~320 - 512 GB, though terrabyte range wouldn't surprise me (I think SGI are still pushing the envelope in this area in their Rackable incarnation).

Re:BLAKE2: “Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger” Than MD5 by mnordhoff on Saturday March 22, 2014 @02:01PM (#7450113)
That's still a bit of a distance from 5000000000000000000000000000 TiB. (I'm counting 2^128 128-bit values, not just 2^128 bytes.)