SBCL: The Ultimate Assembly Code Breadboard

Re:SBCL: The Ultimate Assembly Code Breadboard by pjmlp on Sunday March 16, 2014 @12:55PM (#7410136)

Any language can have a REPL, it is a plain implementation issue.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SBCL: The Ultimate Assembly Code Breadboard by lispm on Sunday March 16, 2014 @06:21PM (#7411666)

It's not. You will detect that in many cases it is a language issue, too. If you look at Lisp, you can see that the language definitions are optimized for interactive use and have a lot of facilities defined at the language level: incremental definitions, evaluation, effects of loading code, a robust interactive error system, ...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SBCL: The Ultimate Assembly Code Breadboard by pjmlp on Monday March 17, 2014 @03:26AM (#7413630)

How come it is not?

- Create an interpreter library for language X

- Offer a GUI/CLI application using the said library

Not all repls need to work at function level like LISP does.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SBCL: The Ultimate Assembly Code Breadboard by lispm on Monday March 17, 2014 @09:11AM (#7414792)

http://stackoverflow.com/a/9446693/69545

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SBCL: The Ultimate Assembly Code Breadboard by pjmlp on Monday March 17, 2014 @11:28AM (#7415598)

So you use existing bugs in one given implementation to defend your point of view?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SBCL: The Ultimate Assembly Code Breadboard by lispm on Thursday March 20, 2014 @04:15AM (#7434391)

So you redefine missing features due to language problems as 'bug' to defend your point of view?

[ Parent | on HN ]