Re:Hapax legomenon
by doe88 on Thursday March 06, 2014 @07:24AM
(#7353235)
But I'm wondering, if a word only appears one time, in a single book, how do we know it is a real word and not a new word invented by his author or a mistake?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hapax legomenon
by JacobAldridge on Thursday March 06, 2014 @07:48AM
(#7353331)
What, pray tell, is the difference between a real word and a new word invented?
Reminds me of an author who was given a brand-new Oxford English Dictionary (a 20-volume English dictionary with etymologies) by one of his fans. His wife was proof-reading a new manuscript when she came across a word that she was sure wasn't real English. He said "Oh, I'm sure it's in the dictionary!" so she went to look. A few minutes later she comes in, throws the volume at him, and storms out. Confused, he flips to the word in the volume and finds the etymology is... his earlier book!
Re:Hapax legomenon
by gshubert17 on Thursday March 06, 2014 @10:25AM
(#7354181)
This is a real problem, especially in Homeric Greek and Biblical Hebrew. One approach to figuring out what such words mean, is to go to similar words in related languages. Another is to use earlier translations (such as the Septuagint from Hebrew to Greek in the first or second centuries BCE), when the translators likely had a better sense of what the words meant.
Re:Hapax legomenon
by InclinedPlane on Thursday March 06, 2014 @08:29AM
(#7353492)
I believe most hapax legomena to be cromulent.
Re:Hapax legomenon
by Intermernet on Thursday March 06, 2014 @08:38AM
(#7353548)
Are you just trying to embiggen the cromulence around here?