Re:Ship's cat
by ColdHawaiian on Monday March 03, 2014 @04:04AM
(#7332740)
Why would using SSL makes a difference, if all we're doing is just reading an article? I don't understand.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Subject has been found to have accessed the following listed publications:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship's_cat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-tank_dog
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management_of_Savagery
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casio_F-91W
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acetone_peroxide
Subject has been flagged for FRUITFLY, AFFECTIONATEOCTOPUS, EMBARRASSEDGIBBON, ■■■■RAG■■■■ and as crucial target in operation SPRINGDOM.
Re:Ship's cat
by harshreality on Monday March 03, 2014 @04:31AM
(#7332816)
Profiling people based on what wikipedia pages they view is not a difficult thing to do.
Https doesn't encrypt the URL you are reading, which kind of gives away what content you're reading when it comes to wikipedia.
Yes it does. Your dns request for the hostname and the ip address you connect to might give away the fact that you're reading wikipedia but the actual path will be encrypted.
Re:Ship's cat
by stevedekorte on Friday March 14, 2014 @03:23PM
(#7401151)
Unfortunately, this is of no help if Wikipedia or it's hosting provider (and therefore every machine it runs on) is compromised.
Surely it does. Did you think GETs are transferred before the encrypted connection is established?