Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola...
by BHSPitMonkey on Thursday February 27, 2014 @02:42PM
(#7314468)
I didn't say they can't prove the phone belongs to you. They cannot prove that you know or remember the decryption key.
Additionally, in U.S. case law there is a precedent for 5th amendment protections applying to being forced to reveal encryption keys:
https://www.eff.org/press/releases/appeals-court-upholds-con...
Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola...
by drjesusphd on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @10:22PM
(#7310151)
What if I implemented a dead-man's switch so that if I don't respond regularly, it will be impossible for me access data?
Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola...
by dredmorbius on Thursday February 27, 2014 @09:35AM
(#7312363)
Then there's the case of destruction of evidence. Depends on a number of circumstances, possibly including whether or not it takes a positive act or merely the lack of an action, on your part, to ensure the data continue to exist.
Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola...
by beedogs on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @10:37PM
(#7310234)
There are so many things that can be done digitally that bump up against the first, fourth, and fifth amendments as well as laws about the destruction of evidence. It's a mess.
It's not bulletproof like some sort of mathematical proof, but the law operates with much looser standards of proof.