News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola... by Crito on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @08:19PM (#7309628)
Sure they can. When they find your fingerprints on it, your name on the bill, people willing to testify that they consider the number that the phone is associated with to be yours, etc.

It's not bulletproof like some sort of mathematical proof, but the law operates with much looser standards of proof.

Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola... by BHSPitMonkey on Thursday February 27, 2014 @02:42PM (#7314468)
I didn't say they can't prove the phone belongs to you. They cannot prove that you know or remember the decryption key.

Additionally, in U.S. case law there is a precedent for 5th amendment protections applying to being forced to reveal encryption keys:

https://www.eff.org/press/releases/appeals-court-upholds-con...

Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola... by drjesusphd on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @10:22PM (#7310151)
What if I implemented a dead-man's switch so that if I don't respond regularly, it will be impossible for me access data?
Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola... by dredmorbius on Thursday February 27, 2014 @09:35AM (#7312363)
Then there's the case of destruction of evidence. Depends on a number of circumstances, possibly including whether or not it takes a positive act or merely the lack of an action, on your part, to ensure the data continue to exist.
Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola... by beedogs on Wednesday February 26, 2014 @10:37PM (#7310234)
There are so many things that can be done digitally that bump up against the first, fourth, and fifth amendments as well as laws about the destruction of evidence. It's a mess.
Re:Texas Appeals Court Rules Phone Search After Arrest Viola... by Crito on Thursday February 27, 2014 @01:00AM (#7310637)
Are you asking what would actually happen if you did this, or what would happen if you told the courts that you could not let them into your phone because you did this?