News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Neovim by ggreer on Friday February 21, 2014 @03:53PM (#7279358)
The author of NeoVim (Thiago de Arruda) tried to add support for multi-threaded plugins to Vim and has been stymied[1].

I'm not sure how to get a patch merged into Vim. Bram Moolenar is the only person with commit access, and he's not a fan of most changes beyond bug fixes. My co-founder and I tried to add setTimeout & setInterval to vimscript[2]. Even six weeks of full-time effort and bending over backwards wasn't enough. Eventually we were just ignored.

I've contributed to a lot of open source projects, and the Vim community has been the most difficult to work with. I've been writing C for almost two decades, and the Vim codebase is the worst C I've ever seen[3]. The project is definitely showing its age, and I'd love for something new to replace it.

1. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/vim_dev/65jjGqS1_VQ/fFiFrrIB...

2. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/vim_dev/-4pqDJfHCsM/LkYNCpZj...

3. If you value your sanity, do not read eval.c. It is over 25,000 lines and has over 400 ifdefs. The first ifdef checks for Amiga; the second checks for VMS: https://github.com/b4winckler/macvim/blob/master/src/eval.c

Re:Neovim by teacup50 on Saturday February 22, 2014 @10:54PM (#7284854)
Your patches were broken. Now your answer is to fork? Sheesh.

> The project is definitely showing its age, and I'd love for something new to replace it.

Then start over. Refactoring it will be nigh impossible.

Re:Neovim by gdr on Sunday February 23, 2014 @04:41AM (#7285411)
Vim was created on Amiga, so that's explainable
Re:Neovim by oblio on Saturday February 22, 2014 @03:00PM (#7283353)
Re #3. Dude - you broke my browser with that link :(