News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Debunking Princeton. Parent comment

Re:Debunking Princeton by throwaway_yy2Di on Thursday January 23, 2014 @05:59PM (#7112044)
"There should be consequences for the people who publish these things."

Many who are published deserve obscurity. And some who have obscurity deserve more funding. Can you give it to them?

Do not be so eager to deal out censorship; for even institutional review boards cannot see all ends.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Debunking Princeton by OnyeaboAduba on Thursday January 23, 2014 @06:35PM (#7112270)
That was an impressive use of the Lord of the Rings lines in your comment I must say
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Debunking Princeton by deevus on Thursday January 23, 2014 @06:36PM (#7112282)
Yes, Professor Gandalf.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Debunking Princeton by ogreyonder on Thursday January 23, 2014 @08:05PM (#7112728)
For a throwaway, you are remarkable.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Debunking Princeton by saraid216 on Friday January 24, 2014 @12:04AM (#7113424)
FYI, half the people with the name "throwaway" aren't throwaways. :P
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Debunking Princeton by eternalban on Friday January 24, 2014 @10:05AM (#7115167)
So we have a culture of social insecurity at HN. #masks
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Debunking Princeton by saraid216 on Saturday January 25, 2014 @12:50AM (#7120005)
Nostalgia for anonymity. And also, sometimes you make a throwaway and then need to respond to a response and then you respond to something else while logged in and then you have 50 karma points and well, why not?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Debunking Princeton by ecuzzillo on Thursday January 23, 2014 @08:54PM (#7112915)
s/censorship/censure/
[ Parent | on HN ]