Still, I don't get why this piece insists on their lack of intention to out her in the published article, while admitting they outed her to an investor.
Feels like 'we dont want to tell the world about it, we just told it to some public figure in your field'
"2. You need to make it more clear within the piece that Caleb never, at any point, threatened to out her as he was doing his reporting.
3. You need to make it more clear that, before her death, you never internally discussed the possibility of outing her (and we didn’t)."
If you read the original piece without this knowledge it sounds like they wrote an article outing her, told her they would publish it and she then killed herself. What actually seems to have happened is that they only wrote the version of the article outing her after her death.