News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sorry, RSA, I'm just not buying it by a3vioces on Monday December 23, 2013 @05:06PM (#6956814)
Yes, it was 600k.
Re:Sorry, RSA, I'm just not buying it by jwcrux on Monday December 23, 2013 @05:13PM (#6956866)
Do you by chance know the source?
Re:Sorry, RSA, I'm just not buying it by dotBen on Tuesday December 24, 2013 @08:22AM (#6959272)
And where exactly did the money go?

$600k is a lot of money to implement an existing standard. That's 4-5 annual engineer salaries. I'm wondering exactly how much work was actually undertook for $600k and whether those doing it (/charging for it/taking the money) felt it was unusual size remuneration.

Re:Sorry, RSA, I'm just not buying it by DannyBee on Tuesday December 24, 2013 @09:48AM (#6959522)
"$600k is a lot of money to implement an existing standard."

Not if such a requirement includes things like FIPS validation, which is entirely possible in this case.

Plus, in some cases, these things are done in liu of donations, etc.

I can think of plenty of cases where well known contractors on open source projects have been paid very well simply as a way of showing support for that project.

Re:Sorry, RSA, I'm just not buying it by andrewcooke on Tuesday December 24, 2013 @10:14AM (#6959636)
the only other comment by this acct was a weird attempt to impersonate someone else. it seems more like a troll than an anon informer.