News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on P = NP [pdf]. Parent comment

Re:P = NP [pdf] by Schwolop on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @06:14PM (#6851200)
Where did you see that it's from August 2012? I recall a claim in August 2010 by Vinay Deolalikar of the opposing view, but haven't seen much public attention since.

Ah - I see now. Gotcha.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:P = NP [pdf] by sukuriant on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @06:21PM (#6851260)
Where did you see? I looked at revisions and noticed that the recent revisions were in 2013.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:P = NP [pdf] by madcaptenor on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @06:56PM (#6851527)
The original version is from August 2012. I didn't look at the revision history. In any case, having that long of a revision history (31 versions!) also seems like a red flag.
[ Parent | on HN ]