Re:Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1M Stolen
by dragontamer on Monday November 25, 2013 @12:12PM
(#6795300)
>You can have the hot wallet only deal with multi-signature outputs
Then you don't have a cold-wallet scheme. You have a hot wallet scheme.
Re:Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1M Stolen
by TylerE on Monday November 25, 2013 @12:12PM
(#6795297)
You can do anything if you allow massive handwaving. ("out-of-band mechanisms for approving transactions")
Re:Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1M Stolen
by maaku on Monday November 25, 2013 @12:46PM
(#6795558)
Do I have to spell it out? The machine could be under physical control of its operators, with rate limiting restrictions lifted only by manual intervention via a GUI interface, making the low bandwidth TOR connection the only link to the outside world (and a simple one at that). Or the the verification and signing steps done via TPM so as to prevent key theft. There are other possibilities too.
This isn't handwavery. It's basic security engineering.
Yes, you can. You can have the hot wallet only deal with multi-signature outputs, and have these approved by separately locked down servers running behind TOR, for example, using out-of-band mechanisms for approving transactions.