maaku

Leave provocative statements as-is and censor succinct and appropriate responses? You should reconsider what effect that policy has given context.

Goodbye.

(Bug report: there appears to be no way to delete accounts.)

Fuck off.

I did read part of the article but didn't finish because it is too depressing to read about someone murdering family out of ignorance. Thanks for letting me know how it ended.

If you're waiting for revival to be shown then your missing the point. The whole idea is to halt decay while there are problems that can't be solved yet. It's an ambulance ride to the future.

Somebody should talk to the OP's mother about cryonics.

You're assuming machines can't be creative.

The LTS stability doesn't really start until the .1 release.

Certainly. Also weather balloons that were in fact doing remote observation of Soviet nuclear weapons testing (see project Mogul run out of Roswell, NM).

They are in fact teenagers by the modern definitions. You were a full responsible adult shortly after puberty. Many of the greats did their best work before 20.

Sometimes you want to read the article.

Demurrage money.

In HPC?

You do cryptographic compute. You're about the only HPC application that benefits from AMD architecture. Most other scientific compute and deep learning applications have horrible performance on AMD compared with NVIDIA (usually for software reasons that are in principle fixable, but it is what it is).

If there were blank white columns on either side of text in the middle, you wouldn't have complained.

> I'm not sure anyone would pay for this feature to use themselves

I said open-source.

That only works until people start doing it. Then it retroactively stops working.

The only way to prevent your face from being recognized is by not having your face in a photo to begin with.

So invent an open-source federated server with deep learning capabilities that can do this and keep us in charge of our data.

The article says it is opt-in.

They do. They have a retargeting compiler. It's performance sucks.

The point is if you sum up what people would want to do with their time, there's no reason to expect that in any way corresponds with what the allocation of resources should be to keep the engines of the economy moving / achieve maximal societal benefit / whatever. It's a classic tragedy of the commons situation.

I suppose he is also more likely to clean the public toilets too?

> Basically, I'd drop out of the workforce in a heartbeat if I could afford living and a few minimal luxuries. $15-20k/year would do the job to split a cheap apartment with a friend and keep the rest under control. This is half of what some people have proposed as a UBI.

By the way this might be very doable for you on a short timescale, if you pull in the kind of salary most people do on HN. Studies show that if you retire and pull only <4% of your starting balance each year to live off, you can live off it for 30+ years, if not indefinitely. If you were earning $120k, but only spending $20k/yr, you'd have enough wealth to live off after only 7.5 years.

Having sufficient passive income so as to not have to work is wealth.

Why wouldn't I just let someone else figure out how to automate jobs? I've got my income. Let someone else figure that out.

LOTS of different reasons.

He unnecessarily genderified it.

s/man/human/

I think you (or the people you are describing) are bringing a lot of unjustified assumptions to the table regarding why people make use of prostitution.

You really think we won't be able to build a better sex bot?

What action have you taken to have a new traffic light installed?

How do we know that?