[1]: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-18/credit-driven-china...
Bitcoin right now is an incredibly bad long term value store. Right now it's a speculative investment. Either it will succeed and demand for bitcoin will go even higher or it will fail and it will be worth nothing. It's like investing in some risky VC fund. It makes sense for people to have wildly different ideas about potential and risk, but it makes no sense to expect it to just stay where it is.
If you judge BTC simply by the latter, and have the patience for re-evaluating your BTC finances annually or bi-annually, then you'd be in a pretty good spot.
Sure it fluctuates an uncomfortable amount on a regular basis, but it's a fairly consistent trend otherwise.
It's a deflationary currency. Sure there may be rises and falls, but in the long term, the trend will only be in one direction.
Seems like Bitcoin is instead becoming a new class of asset rather than a currency.
It could lead to increased capital formation (savings) and less frivolous spending, eg spending only on necessities and appreciating assets, and less on throwaway, planned obsolete junk, while still maintaining enough velocity not to stall the economy. Leaner but still viable. Of course, getting from here to there will not be painless.
Who knows, jury's still out on it imho, will have to watch and see. Front-row seats to one of the greatest economic experiments of history, for better or worse.
Bitcoin, like gold, is it's own counterparty. If you own bitcoin, you own it irrevocably unless you choose to give it to someone else.
Combine that with the fact that it is globally accessible, globally transferrable, and incredibly low cost to keep secure and you've got something which disrupts 5000 years of financial history.
Risky investment doesn't mean bad investment. Startup equity can be a good investment too. I'm just saying bitcoin is not a safe value store, which is what nl was hypothesizing in his comment.
To generalise massively, Chinese aren't trying to move money out of China.
Instead, they are trying to find any safe store of value, because they don't trust their banks.
Chinese are desperate for any way to save money, because the four-grandparent policy (and no pension) means they need money in old age.
The optimal solution for them is overseas real estate (see the real estate market in Hong Kong, Sydney & Vancouver).
The non-optimal solution used to be domestic real-estate. This solution was less than ideal, because of the huge oversupply in the Chinese domestic market. Chinese investors are aware of that, but "happy" to lose some money, rather than all of it in the case of a bank (and additionally, inflation in China is ~8%, but banks only pay ~1% interest).
It looks like Bitcoin is taking the place of some of that domestic real estate demand.
Note this is only my personal theory, but based on observations from http://brontecapital.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/macroeconomics-...