News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by ancarda on Thursday November 14, 2013 @01:39PM (#6734396)
I still use MySQL because trying out PostgreSQL recently scared me away. Maybe I was trying the wrong thing but I couldn't get pgAdmin to display my tables. I think I sank most of my afternoon trying unsuccessfully to do something MySQL can do in 5 minutes.

I recognize I'm used to MySQL but I was under the impression that because PostgreSQL has a similar syntax (SQL) it wouldn't take too long to pickup.

Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by mixmastamyk on Thursday November 14, 2013 @02:21PM (#6734781)
Unfortunately things that take 5 minutes in a complex application typically required an order of magnitude larger investment up front in manual reading and experience.
Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by gtaylor on Thursday November 14, 2013 @03:40PM (#6735386)
I deal with Postgres a good bit, but will be the first to tell you that pgAdmin has got some issues. It's a very clunky, buggy, moody piece of software.

I've had better luck learning how to use the psql command/shell than mess with pgAdmin, at least in certain cases. To take your example of displaying tables, psql in and type: \dt

The rest is just a search away.

Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by KingMob on Thursday November 14, 2013 @04:56PM (#6735931)
I have idle daydreams where Sequel Pro is finally ported to Postgres. pgAdmin is horrendous.
Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by ancarda on Thursday November 14, 2013 @05:54PM (#6736310)
That would be amazing. Sequel Pro makes MySQL management so easy. Have you emailed the author asking for that feature?

Edit: It seems they are working on it but I i'm not sure when we can expect a release: http://stuconnolly.com/blog/sequel-pro-postgresql-support/

Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by porker on Friday November 15, 2013 @03:23AM (#6738329)
I've used Sequel Pro and I don't understand why others love it; it's as clunky as anything I've ever used. My preference is for SQLyog - and my dream is that to be ported to OSX...
Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by enjo on Friday November 15, 2013 @12:50AM (#6737966)
That article is from September of 2012.
Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by johne20 on Thursday November 14, 2013 @09:50PM (#6737387)
I have always stated postgres would become much more widely adopted if it was released on RDS and.... they finish the sequel pro support. Half way there ;)
Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by jherdman on Thursday November 14, 2013 @01:51PM (#6734512)
Can you elaborate further?
Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by ancarda on Thursday November 14, 2013 @02:25PM (#6734812)
Coming from a MySQL background, I sort-of assumed PostgreSQL worked the same way. I remember after setting up the server, pgAdmin was very difficult to navigate. I managed to get a database and table made and got some data in (using SQL) but I couldn't view any of the data. Compared to MySQL + Sequel Pro it was very difficult to use for a beginner.

Postgres is very powerful and can do a lot. I think I just need a good tutorial and some time to get used to it.

Re:Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL by Sssnake on Thursday November 14, 2013 @07:29PM (#6736882)
None of that has anything to do with postgresql. Pgadmin is crappy, don't use it. Use one of the dozens of database independent admin tools, or just stick with the best tool: psql.