Re:Pyret: A new programming language from the creators of Ra...
by andrewflnr on Monday November 11, 2013 @07:47PM
(#6715145)
The behavior carried around by those objects is ultimately in the form of flat digital data, interpreted by other, more general programs, executed on a CPU. Behavior, when it comes down to it, is a property of silicon, not data. This might seem like a useless distinction, but I don't think it is. I like to keep track of what things are underneath the abstractions.
I know this is false. You can have a system where everything is an object and carries behavior around with it. We've had those for over 40 years.
> I am in favor of giving links between data a more prominent place in our storage systems.
A "more prominent place?" Isn't this a bit bass-ackwards? Aren't relationships in code where the primary value is?