Re:Things that suck in AngularJS
by general_failure on Monday October 28, 2013 @07:28PM
(#6630578)
If you think angular docs are bad , you should try ember. Ember is so frustrating. All answers on SO are out of date or wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Things that suck in AngularJS
by davissorenson on Tuesday October 29, 2013 @03:57AM
(#6632549)
It used to be like this, but throughout this year in preparation for the 1.0 release the devs really stepped it up. The official guides are good nowadays.
Neither good SO answers nor docs emerge out of thin air. If you find the right way to do something, document it, write it down, submit a PR.
Re:Things that suck in AngularJS
by terbanator on Tuesday October 29, 2013 @10:35AM
(#6634389)
I've found quite the opposite. Ember docs are very clear, constantly being refined and tweaked, and the core devs are actually willing to take input to improve upon them.
Ember creators cleary did not know where they were heading when they began writing it.
AngularJS was influenced by Flex and Spry( the creator worked at Adobe ) from the start, and still is.
Ember was heavily influenced by Sproutcore
Re:Things that suck in AngularJS
by davissorenson on Tuesday October 29, 2013 @03:54AM
(#6632535)
Ember WAS Sproutcore, Sproutcore 2.0 is what became Ember.
Worth noting: Sproutcore was used to build iCloud, apparently.
that's what I thought, so clearly Ember wasn't written from Scratch
The ember docs have improved immensely over the past few months - they're currently significantly better than the angular docs.