News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Bitcoin Can Save Publishing by patio11 on Monday October 07, 2013 @11:10PM (#6512801)
Google has developed this pass, and sell about $15 billion or so of it a year, with roughly $10 billion of that distributed to publishers. (Pulling numbers from memory -- check their quarterlies for the up-to-date ones.) The genius was denominating the end-user price in attention, which doesn't require a credit card number to transact in (single-click transactions, no information required, and no penny gap -- whee!), and then selling attention of desirable users to advertisers for substantial amounts of money.

Given the substantial success of Google at doing this, any micropayments system doesn't just have to clear the "Will this be better than putting up a paywall?" hurdle for every site it signs up, it also has to clear "Is this better than the largest, most entrenched, most locked-in, most supported, most widely distributed economic engine on the Internet?"

Re:How Bitcoin Can Save Publishing by jacques_chester on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @09:19AM (#6514607)
Contenture bet on users being prepared to pay to have ad-free sites. They gave up early; but to be honest their "no ads" scheme wasn't going to work anyway. It relied on a piece of javascript removing common ad blocks from the DOM.

The main problem is reliably identifying who is a legitimate subscriber. I happen to have a robust solution for that problem which this margin is too small to contain.

Re:How Bitcoin Can Save Publishing by TylerE on Wednesday October 09, 2013 @08:12PM (#6524835)
That part is easy...just require logins and don't serve the content at all unless they are authorized to see it.
Re:How Bitcoin Can Save Publishing by jacques_chester on Wednesday October 09, 2013 @10:18PM (#6525302)
You're thinking of paywalls; it's a different model.