News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Bitcoin Can Save Publishing by TylerE on Monday October 07, 2013 @06:54PM (#6511872)
Yea, pretty much, that's where I think it should go. Sort of Spotify for written content.

Some very high profile outlets (WSJ, NY Times, New Yorker, the Economist) might be able to make their own things work, but those are the exception, not the rule.

Re:How Bitcoin Can Save Publishing by walid on Monday October 07, 2013 @07:34PM (#6512051)
I'm sorry but you're wrong with the elitist view you're taking on paid content. The problem is not that high profile publishers succeed while others fail. The real problem is that no new monetizing mechanism is used. Take in-app purchasing as a payment model for news and voila, money rolls in the coffers.

To make a point, FarmVille is not high profile. It is for everyone who is anyone. On the other hand EA bought a game called Pet Society which had a loyal following whom I knew some of. The first thing EA did was change the payment model and then all hell broke loose. People I personally know started complaining and EA eventually closed down that game. The problem is not in either elitism or micro-payments but rather in the sales approach.

Re:How Bitcoin Can Save Publishing by joanofarf on Monday October 07, 2013 @07:41PM (#6512070)
Sort of Spotify for written content.

Wouldn't this end up leaving even more money on the table? Spotify pays artists based on their share of total plays.

Say two sites (X and Y) join up to offer a $10/month pass for unlimited access to both sites, with the say pay scheme as Spotify. Site X has 3 times as many articles/videos as Site Y. If every user reads/watches 100% of Site Y's content, Site X may still receive an equal or larger share of the payouts even though users consumed a much lower percentage of it.

Re:How Bitcoin Can Save Publishing by cmsmith on Monday October 07, 2013 @10:10PM (#6512598)
If you make the assumption that each piece of 'content' takes the same amount of effort/money to produce, that's not really a problem. Site X has presumably spent 3 times as much on content creation, so it's fine for them to get 3 times the revenue (assuming equal quality).

The problem I see is that with spotify it's pretty easy to determine the rate of content consumption (e.g. songs or minutes listened). News sites are pretty adept at turning one piece of content into many (multi-page articles or slideshows), and the system would have to protect against that.

Re:How Bitcoin Can Save Publishing by TylerE on Monday October 07, 2013 @10:18PM (#6512621)
Another option might be to proportion revenue in accordance with membership sources into the cartel. E.g. if site 1 delivers 10 new subscribers, and site 2 brings in 2 new subscribers, the money goes to the sites in a 5:1 ratio, minus maybe 10% off the top for operating expenses.
Re:How Bitcoin Can Save Publishing by TylerE on Monday October 07, 2013 @07:49PM (#6512106)
I don't know - but I suspect some reasonably equitable scheme could be figured.