Show HN: UI improvements for Jenkins

Re:Show HN: UI improvements for Jenkins by FreshCode on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @04:05AM (#6474838)

I opted to use TeamCity for all my CI exactly because of the UI. It's not perfect either, but I think it is vastly superior. Bigger install, though and relies on a JVM.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: UI improvements for Jenkins by manojlds on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @08:03AM (#6475552)

You might also want to look at Go[1] from ThoughtWorks* - the UI and first class Pipeline support is it +ves.

[1] - http://www.thoughtworks.com/products/go-continuous-delivery/...

* - I work for ThoughtWorks, but not associated with the Go team, and use Teamcity and Jenkins more than Go.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: UI improvements for Jenkins by shaggyfrog on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @11:33AM (#6476821)

Superior? Depends on what you're building. Using TeamCity to set up builds for iOS is a royal pain in the ass, and their OS X support in general is greatly lacking. I've had to create a whole ecosystem of shell scripts just to produce signed .ipa builds for QA -- which is kinda the point of purchasing a licence to a CI system to begin with.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: UI improvements for Jenkins by borplk on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @05:07AM (#6475017)

is it free?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: UI improvements for Jenkins by falsedan on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @06:00AM (#6475160)

The Professional license is free and gives 20 active build configurations & 3 simultaneous builds. I install extra instances if I need more.

[ Parent | on HN ]