I also bet, in 99.9999% or more of those cases, the attacker doesn't even attempt to bypass the security by faking the users fingerprint.
I'd also be willing to bet that these figures are substantially better than the current situation where people don't bother to lock their phone at all. People will use it because it's a gimmick, not because of it's security properties, but it will still work.
Activation Lock + Touch ID = all the security that almost anyone needs on a phone and much higher security than any of us have been used to up to now.
But with the new Activation Lock, it supposedly doesn't matter if it is shut down, the minute someone tries to flash the phone. Be it normally via iTunes or via DFU mode and iTunes there should appear a message that the phone has been wiped and must be unlocked with the iCloud password of the account that did the wiping. So no chance to flash the phone back to factory settings.
You can't be serious. A completely unlocked phone that anybody can trivially access with a swipe.. vs. a scanner that you'd have to lift and reconstruct someone's fingerprint to bypass. That is definitely a significant improvement.
Sure is a significant improvement for some people at least. http://t.co/EK3sdeloUX
What operating system I prefer really has nothing to do with it, even if it is linux.
Posted from my iPhone, android, third mac mini, 2nd mac air, or first thinkpad who the fuck knows (or cares? oh you obviously)
> Touch ID does not store any images of your fingerprint. It stores only a mathematical representation of your fingerprint.
> The Secure Enclave is walled off from the rest of A7 and as well as the rest of iOS. Therefore, your fingerprint data is never accessed by iOS or other apps, never stored on Apple servers, and never backed up to iCloud or anywhere else. Only Touch ID uses it and it can't be used to match against other fingerprint databases.
It absolutely isn't. Even if just the hash were sent over the wire (or if it were possible for the authorities to extract it over the wire), it would be perfectly possible for the authorities to run the same hash algorithm on their candidate print and see if the hashes match. Such evidence would likely not be admissible in court but 1) it would be enough to give the authorities a tipoff, 2) for matters deemed important enough, secret trials seem to be all the rage these days.
I would be _very_ surprised if there were no backdoor in iPhones for the authorities. Even their "secure" area. The U.S. authorities simply do not take no for an answer when having a "talk" with a vendor producing a widespread "security" related product.
I'm not sure if you understand what FUD means. Your surprise or lack thereof does not count as evidence, and is irrelevant to whether something is FUD or not.
> MS Exec: "I'd be very surprised if Linux had a lower TCO than Windows Server."
Canonical example of FUD. EXACT same thing as you're saying, just in a different context.
You've got to be careful when you say things like that, because they're trivial to refute.
The whole point of a backdoor is to be obfuscated and hard to find. So it would be very likely that you would not find one even if one were present. Your example is simply a Microsoft not bothering to do something that's perfectly researchable.
We don't have any _proof_ that Dual EC DRBG is defeatable to the NSA. By your logic we should still be using it happily until we have that proof and until then any caution is simply "FUD".
So if that's "FUD", then I've got news for you: the security world is very sensibly built upon FUD.
Which in this case doesn't matter because you're talking complete nonsense. Apple does not send your fingerprint over the wire.
TouchID represents a massive increase in security over draw pattern to unlock, and it's easier to use at the same time.
It probably also represents an increase in security over 4 digit PIN codes, though that's shakier.
If somebody swipes on their homescreen, browse the web, etc, the trail would not be just the unlock pattern.
The exploit you're talking about may work if you get hold of the phone right after the user unlocks it since the trail only has the pattern.
It's much easier that you imagine. I've been using my phone as I normally do throughout the day, and I can see the unlock pattern clearly on the phone.
The way that Apple haters use stunts like this to suspend normal logic and reasoning in order to express their juvenile spite is staggering.
No one, ever, claimed TouchID was impregnable, but it is very good security and is better than what the vast majority of people do at present.
Anyone prepared to devote the time and resources that CCC did to breaking your phone has other simpler means at their disposal. I personally believe that no one else will replicate this achievement because it is simply a publicity stunt to get clicks and feed the hordes of anti-Apple zealots.
The threat is similar. Now there is an exploit.. now the collective security researcher (and hacktivist) will work to make the hack easier by building a tool.. THERE lies the real danger.
I still commend Apple for trying. The real issue will be if I can steal the "Hash" of the fingerprint and reverse it to know who it is... so far TouchId has done well. The way that happens, Apple users will need to rethink using TouchID
Really? Lift someone's print, leave it with superglue, scan and print it and then dump glue on the scan.
That seems to be the sum total of what needs to be done. You need only sticky tape to lift the print and the rest can be done in an hour.
It sounds quite action movie, but in reality it's pretty damn simple and if I wanted to get access to your phone I could easily prepare it in advance and carry a tiny latex strip in my wallet for just the right occasion without your knowledge at any point.
Also in reality it will foil over 99% of potential unauthorized activation attempts as most people aren't going to craft fingerprints to get into someone's device.
If reality is the bar you're using, TouchID still wins.
Also, it's not remotely "pretty damn simple":
https://blog.lookout.com/blog/2013/09/23/why-i-hacked-apples...
"Creating the fake fingerprint is arguably the hardest part and by no means “easy.” It is a lengthy process that takes several hours and uses over a thousand dollars worth of equipment..."
If having TouchID will increase the amount of people that doesn't lock thir phone I'm up for it. But is not this amazing super-secure technology that will revolutionize the world.
I've read there is already something like 35% adoption of iOS7 so we may see soon how effective Activation Lock is at deterring theft.
Touch ID is better than nothing and that people use Touch ID instead of nothing is better than the current state but not by much and this definitely isn't a huge achievement. Which is really the biggest issue with Touch ID, it's advertised as such and people believe it.