Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by jamesli on Friday September 06, 2013 @12:00PM (#6341074)

"Keep in mind that there are many dialects of Mandarin and what this ministry is referring to is the fact that people do not speak the Beijing dialect well, which is the national standard."

Strictly speaking, 1) there are many dialects of Chinese, not Mandarin. 2) the language many Beijing people speak is not a dialect. It is an accent. Cantonese is a dialect. Wu Chinese is a dialect. Beijing Chinese is an accent. It is definitely not the national standard, although it is the closest to the national standard, compared to other accents.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by abayer on Friday September 06, 2013 @12:19PM (#6341192)

Generally, linguists would disagree with that - Cantonese is not mutually intelligible with Mandarin, so it's not a dialect, it's a different language, as are Wu, Hakka, etc... There are fairly profound differences between these languages in their spoken form. It is true that they all share a single written language, and a common language ancestry, but Cantonese (the spoken language) is at least as different from Mandarin (the spoken language) as Spanish and Portuguese, or Dutch and German.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by mmorris on Friday September 06, 2013 @01:08PM (#6341444)

I am not a linguist, per se, but my understanding is that there is no formal definition (or even agreement) on what constitutes a separate language versus a separate dialect. Rather, a number of factors are taken into consideration (including political factors), and the distinction is almost always debatable.

While it is desperate for citations, it looks like the Wikipedia article supports that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialect#Dialect_or_language

There is also an episode of one of my favorite podcasts (Slate's Lexicon Valley) that focuses on this issue, particularly in regards to what has sometimes been called "Ebonics": http://www.slate.com/articles/podcasts/lexicon_valley/2012/0...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by kyllo on Friday September 06, 2013 @01:46PM (#6341658)

The common analogy is that Chinese "dialects" are really different languages in the same Chinese language family (they have a common ancestor), the same way that Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Corsican, Catalan, etc. are different languages in the Romance language family (their common ancestor is Latin).

Where it gets confusing is when nationalism gets involved. Mandarin and Wu are different "dialects" of the same "language" because they're from the same country. Italian and Spanish are different "languages" because they're from different countries. It's a political distinction.

Linguists tend toward using mutual intelligibility as the difference between a language and a dialect, but it's fuzzy. Beijing and Shanghai dialect are almost totally mutually unintelligible, but if you walked from Beijing down to Shanghai, each village, town, or city you pass will speak a dialect that's still mutually intelligible with the immediately neighboring village/town/city's.

But really, the words "dialect" and "language" mean essentially the same thing in English.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by dragonwriter on Friday September 06, 2013 @02:42PM (#6341966)

So, its a "ring language" (by analogy to a "ring species" [1] in biology.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_species

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by abayer on Friday September 06, 2013 @03:13PM (#6342105)

The equivalent term in linguistics is "dialect continuum" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialect_continuum

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by jamesli on Friday September 06, 2013 @02:21PM (#6341843)

Agree. It is not sufficient to use mutual intelligibility to distinguish language from dialect.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by abayer on Friday September 06, 2013 @01:26PM (#6341541)

Ok, then the linguists I read tend to be splitters rather than lumpers. =) This is particularly drama-prone in re: the Chinese languages/dialects due to the tendency for Beijing to attempt to cast all speakers of Chinese languages as in fact speakers of a single language, as part of their attempts to create a single unified Han identity.

But in the end, I really believe that if it weren't for the common written language, no one would ever think of Cantonese as being just a dialect of the same language as Mandarin - the differences between the two spoken languages are so massive.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by jamesli on Friday September 06, 2013 @01:58PM (#6341715)

It involves more than linguistic characteristics to distinguish language from dialect. One can argue for both cases.

I personally prefer to think of Chinese as a language family. It would be a much larger, and very interesting, topic. For the discussion on this thread, I use "dialect" other than "separate languages", since Cantonese, We Chinese, etc. are described as dialects in most materials I read.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by a8da6b0c91d on Friday September 06, 2013 @12:53PM (#6341353)

What is the reality of Wu on the ground in Shanghai? Do you hear both Mandarin and Wu often, or mostly just one? Which one? I assume everybody can actually speak and understand Mandarin?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Beijing says 400 million Chinese cannot speak Mandarin by jamesli on Friday September 06, 2013 @02:30PM (#6341896)

Both Mandarin and Wu (or to be specific, many variations of Wu Chinese) are often heard in Shanghai. Mandarin is used as the common language for people who come from all over China.

[ Parent | on HN ]