Re:First impressions of the IPython Notebook
by ivoflipse on Friday September 06, 2013 @08:16AM
(#6339983)
Then try Anaconda[0], I haven't had any problems with it so far and it includes IPython and most scientific libraries a Python programmer needs.
Re:First impressions of the IPython Notebook
by blutack on Friday September 06, 2013 @08:50AM
(#6340137)
Cheers, that looks really interesting. I usually use pythonxy[0] nowadays on operating systems without package managers, but I'll give that a go next time.
Re:First impressions of the IPython Notebook
by ivoflipse on Friday September 06, 2013 @01:36PM
(#6341604)
You can actually install it alongside Python(x,y), though I get you don't need two Python installs. But at least you can experiment with some of Anaconda's interesting features, without breaking Python(x,y).
Re:First impressions of the IPython Notebook
by zokier on Friday September 06, 2013 @10:59AM
(#6340757)
I don't know why sagemath leaves such bad taste in my mouth. In principle it's very cool project.
Re:First impressions of the IPython Notebook
by Schiphol on Friday September 06, 2013 @02:24PM
(#6341858)
One reason I find Sage cumbersome is that it forces me to have many things installed twice; once standalone, once as part of Sage: Scipy, IPython, Numpy... Sage should figure out a way of using dependencies, like any other package.
I also had a bad experience with Enthought EPD which resulted in a weirdly broken system python.
0: http://www.sagemath.org/