Thanks for the CSV! Here are the top 10 countries by requests per capita[1]:

  Country               Requests    Population    Requests Per Capita
  Malta	                89          415,654       0.000214120398216
  United States (Min)	11000       313,900,000   0.000035043007327
  United Kingdom        1975        62,740,000    0.000031479120179
  Italy	                1705        60,720,000    0.000028079710145
  Australia             546         22,320,000    0.000024462365591
  New Zealand           106         4,405,000     0.000024063564132
  France                1547        65,430,000    0.000023643588568
  Germany               1886        81,800,000    0.000023056234719
  Singapore             107         5,184,000     0.000020640432099
  Portugal              177         10,560,000    0.000016761363636

Here's the full spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AiKnxhgG6s6VdE1...

[1] I used the minimum of the range for the US. Its ranking doesn't change if you use the max.

Population data is from Google searches, which lists the World Bank as a source.

Per capita is misleading, as the report does not tell you the country of the user for which data was requested. If, for instance, Facebook were providing data on a non-US user, that would be counted as a US request.

So? Surely the interesting part about this is which governments are nosy, not the citizenships/residences of the people they're nosy about.

Re: #2. Basically correct. Reporting a range that includes all requests, including those that can't be disclosed individually, is the best outcome we've been able to negotiate so far. Here's the answer in the FAQ:

Why did you report the numbers for the United States in ranges?

We have reported the numbers for all criminal and national security requests to the maximum extent permitted by law. We continue to push the United States government to allow more transparency regarding these requests, including specific numbers and types of national security-related requests. We will publish updated information for the United States as soon as we obtain legal authorization to do so.

I didn't even see that part of the FAQ. That makes sense.

Thanks for making this. It's definitely better to have some data than none.

What confidence to we have that this data is true?

Is this something that could be verified with homomorphic encryption?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homomorphic_encryption

No. If users send unencrypted data to a service provider, they can never use technical means to verify what the service provider does with the data. For example, suppose that some category of user data is automatically printed out on paper every night.

Right, of course. Thanks.

Is this data requested from the NSA by country of target, or data requested by these countries?

Country here means the country making the request.

I am not so sure the US is outpacing the rest by far. Assuming 179 million American FB MAU [1] and the next highest (India, a country I am a citizen of) having ~3200 requests for roughly 78 million MAU [2]. you get (78/179 * 11500) ~ 5000. So India is not too far off and I would suggest giving it time :). Btw, I used 11500 for America as the mean between 11k and 12k since only the range is given.

I guess all governments are spying on their citizens :).

[1] http://techcrunch.com/2013/08/13/facebook-mobile-user-count/

[2] http://www.livemint.com/Consumer/NwNFvLukHEbgbVQH9Dd7UK/Indi...

EDIT: corrected American FB user type to MAU from DAU earlier.

Yeah, but India is a country where private citizens can sometimes obtain cell phone records of other private citizens just by virtue of being powerful men. It's a shitty place for privacy.

RE #3: They could also already have the data and simply be querying Facebook to establish a "backwards chain of evidence".

Hilariously, I'm reading Cryptonomicon right now and that's exactly what Sergent Shafto and crew do by pretending they're finding German submarine secrets.

It's called Parallel Construction

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction

Why is that hilarious? They could easily have gotten the idea from the same place.

Re 3, couldn't it simply be that the US government has the most leverage over Facebook, since Facebook is headquartered in the US, and the majority of its staff and all its senior management live there?

There's no leverage needed, unless you're thinking that the NSA would rather send G-men to disappear the senior staff or something, instead of simply getting a FISA warrant for the hopefully-rare cases where Facebook has reason to push back against an NSL. But Facebook has always claimed they will comply with the law, and the law is very much slanted to the U.S. already, there's not much extra leverage needed.

NSA is undoubtedly not even the only source of these requests either (e.g. many might come from FBI investigating purely "home-grown" extremists, local cops following up on Amber Alerts, etc.), and the non-NSA ones would already have had an Article III warrant issued, which Facebook has always claimed they will obey.

From their FAQ: "The vast majority of these requests relate to criminal cases, such as robberies or kidnappings." and "The report contains the total number of requests we've received from each government, including both criminal and national security requests."

However, even if we ignore all that other nations have their own forms of leverage... it would certainly be easier to unilaterally block Facebook in other countries than in the U.S., for instance.

One other consideration is the number of active accounts in various countries. I imagine the penetration in the United States is one of the highest, and the US population is fairly large as well. It would be interesting to get some sort of a relative factor here to get a sense of how aggressive these governments are seeking information.

Thanks for the summary. Per capita data would help put this in perspective, probably. It's also worth noting that the U.S. likely has a much higher usage rate of Facebook than, for example, Asian countries.

Off-Topic: That CSV isn't rendering in a table. I was under the impression GitHub rendered tabular data now? Or does this not happen for gists?

https://help.github.com/articles/rendering-csv-and-tsv-data

Frankly I'm impressed at how precise the range for the US is.