News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mailpile – taking e-mail back by malandrew on Tuesday August 20, 2013 @02:15PM (#6245492)
I imagine that you can then solve those other problems one at a time by implementing alternatives in your webmail client. The interface to the user can stay the same, but you can add additional more secure transports underneath that the client can opt to use when there is indication that the person they are communicating with uses a mail system that supports that upgraded security solution. In the interface, you just need an indicator of what information is being leaked on a recipient by recipient basis.

At the end of the day this is how filesharing evolved... from FTP to Napster to Kazaa to Torrents to Magnet links. They slowly solved each of the attacks out there.

Re:Mailpile – taking e-mail back by enterthemist on Tuesday August 20, 2013 @02:32PM (#6245641)
You are probably correct. In fact, our solution allows for this type of checking explicitly so that we can (when possible) migrate to better protocols. Interestingly enough, I like your analogy because in all honesty, email is simply file sharing with routing and in path storage.