I found myself backing out of using Foundation after downloading their latest version and trying to use a couple of their javascript components. Lots of bugs and generally fugly workarounds needed for the most basic things.

I just removed it, and went back to Bootstrap.

I was also quite surprised that the javascript components seemed to take a step backwards in design and documentation from Foundation 3 to 4. Not sure why that is.

Except Bootstrap 2.x's JS was terribly basic and didn't play well with single page apps. I haven't tried v3 yet so I don't know if it has improved.

I wouldn't know about that; I've never built a single page app.

Nice opinion. You could have done me a favor and actually offered it in a more helpful way rather than referencing a quote from an idiot....

If anyone else is interested in checking out the foundation framework, here's the link to save you a google: http://foundation.zurb.com/

it used to be for sure, but with the box-sizing and the new grid system ? I don't really know anymore.

I like Foundation for the forms and the grid syntax

but bootstrap has a better default theme and has font awesome for so many icons.

Font Awesome works just fine with Foundation.

I've actually never thought about using it on its own since they're advertising it for Bootstrap only.