News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by manojlds on Saturday August 10, 2013 @12:01PM (#6191515)
Google listened, and Instead of having one more engine that bolsters open web, we also had to lose one because Opera changed as well.
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by Navarr on Saturday August 10, 2013 @01:23PM (#6191866)
I think it'd be hilarious to see what happens to the "open web" if Google changes the vendor prefix in chrome to -blink- instead of -webkit-
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by dchest on Saturday August 10, 2013 @02:01PM (#6192010)
There are no more vendor prefixes.
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by phoboslab on Saturday August 10, 2013 @02:23PM (#6192077)
Is this your prognosis for the future? Because at the moment this simply isn't true.

Try this among of countless other examples in the very latest Chrome Canary:

    document.createElement('canvas').getContext('2d').webkitBackingStorePixelRatio
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by quarterto on Saturday August 10, 2013 @02:52PM (#6192210)
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by aufreak3 on Saturday August 10, 2013 @07:29PM (#6193066)
Vendor prefixes appear to be on the way out. For experimental not-a-standard-yet kind of features, the preference seems to be a browser config switch like "chrome://flags". This is "a good thing" methinks.
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by PavlovsCat on Saturday August 10, 2013 @02:49PM (#6192202)
That's just putting salt on wounds :(
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by w1ntermute on Saturday August 10, 2013 @11:26AM (#6191370)
Hasn't this happened with Blink[0]? And now Opera is going to be using Blink as well.

0: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blink_web_engine

Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by Skalman on Saturday August 10, 2013 @11:36AM (#6191404)
Yes, it has. I think that's why it was posted - someone at Opera predicted/suggested/wanted this to happen.
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by georgemcbay on Saturday August 10, 2013 @08:18PM (#6193183)
True, but there is also a bit of irony to the request in hindsight because the main thrust of the argument was that the more heterogenous the browser market was, the better it would be for web standards.

However, after Google forked WebKit Opera adopted Blink as their rendering engine, making the whole situation basically a wash in the context of the original argument.

Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by winter_blue on Saturday August 10, 2013 @05:14PM (#6192691)
Blink is just a fork of WebCore, not WebKit. There's more to WebKit than WebCore.
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by jbroman on Sunday August 11, 2013 @07:46AM (#6194742)
Blink is a fork of the entire WebKit repository. The lion's share of that is WebCore (especially after removing platform bindings that don't apply to Chromium), but it's entirely fine to call it a fork of WebKit.
Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by ghostdiver on Saturday August 10, 2013 @01:44PM (#6191943)
Flash player(common denominator for all browsers) still runs in separate system process, so I does not look like overall security of web increased at all.

That's not big suprise tho, if you are required to have Adobe Flash player installed in order to use Youtube.

There is also entire advertisement ecosystem built by Google, which relies on flash player... and I don't mean ads here, but all the data about users which Google is harvesting through it thanks to Google Toolbar which is bundled with Flash player.

Re:Dear Google: Please fork WebKit (2010) by diminish on Saturday August 10, 2013 @12:49PM (#6191701)
Dear Opera: Please fork Blink. ..or better not.