Re:Could the Government Get a Search Warrant for Your Thoughts?
by praptak on Saturday July 27, 2013 @04:12PM
(#6114245)
If such a machine exists then it's either a total ban on using it as evidence or the problem of "forced voluntary test": if you don't volunteer, the court infers you have something to hide. The govt doesn't even need the warrant in this case.
Re:Could the Government Get a Search Warrant for Your Thoughts?
by Qantourisc on Saturday July 27, 2013 @01:33PM
(#6113681)
The only way (currently known) is measuring brainwaves.
This can only occur during activity, in witch a question has to be asked, and the the participant will most probably recall the memory.
As a result, this is avoiding laws (which is lame) and in a way you participated in incriminating yourself, but without your consent.
Re:Could the Government Get a Search Warrant for Your Thoughts?
by Qantourisc on Saturday July 27, 2013 @01:35PM
(#6113690)
Ow and if they allow it they should allow it for everyone involved in the case. And ask questions like: are you "Politically moved in your decisions ?", "Are you being forced/paid?", "Why are you really suing this person."
If we want the truth out, make it count for EVERYONE.
Re:Could the Government Get a Search Warrant for Your Thoughts?
by VladRussian2 on Saturday July 27, 2013 @05:24PM
(#6114490)
i see a market emerging for implantable "tin foil hats", ie. a mesh of thin wires implanted under the skin over the skull, so it isn't removable by a police or court order :)
Re:Could the Government Get a Search Warrant for Your Thoughts?
by future_grad on Saturday July 27, 2013 @02:49PM
(#6113958)
There is a way that scientists have been able to analyze photos to discover the pulse of the person in it. Its very interesting, though I do not know the deeper details of it.
I am too lazy to find a link, if anyone else wants to share it that would be great.
Re:Could the Government Get a Search Warrant for Your Thoughts?
by coldcode on Saturday July 27, 2013 @06:28PM
(#6114729)
Could the people require those-who-write-laws' thoughts be recorded first? Imagine how much better our government would be if we knew 100% why they do what they do.
Fun book.
As a result, this is avoiding laws (which is lame) and in a way you participated in incriminating yourself, but without your consent.
So it's torture without the pain.
If we want the truth out, make it count for EVERYONE.
Preferably first by the person allowing the law.
I am too lazy to find a link, if anyone else wants to share it that would be great.
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/amplifying-invisible-vide...