Re:How War in Syria Turned Ordinary Engineers Into Deadly We...
by dragonwriter on Wednesday July 17, 2013 @01:42PM
(#6059023)
> But is it really terrorism at this point? It's a civil war.
Civil war distinguishes context of conflict independent of methods, terrorism distinguishes methods of conflict indepedent of context; they aren't mutually exclusive categories.
Re:How War in Syria Turned Ordinary Engineers Into Deadly We...
by chongli on Wednesday July 17, 2013 @02:54PM
(#6059473)
But is it really terrorism at this point?
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. History is written by the victors.
Language designed to engender support for one opinion or another; propaganda. That's all this crap is.
Re:How War in Syria Turned Ordinary Engineers Into Deadly We...
by darkarmani on Wednesday July 17, 2013 @03:52PM
(#6059852)
> One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. History is written by the victors.
So the Kurds in Northern Iraq that got gassed by Saddam were terrorists? The VC won in Vietnam. Were we the terrorists there? Chiang Kai-shek?
Re:How War in Syria Turned Ordinary Engineers Into Deadly We...
by chongli on Wednesday July 17, 2013 @05:27PM
(#6060291)
I'm not espousing this opinion, it's an (admittedly cynical) commentary on the use of the word terrorist in the media.
Re:How War in Syria Turned Ordinary Engineers Into Deadly We...
by quantumpotato_ on Wednesday July 17, 2013 @01:36PM
(#6058987)
Does the word "terrorism" have a solid definition, or is it "I'll know it when I see it"?
If the residents of New York City rebelled, and managed to take control of 2/3rds of the city, that would be a civil war (or at least I would classify it as such), even if Al Qaeda showed up to participate.