It's not really useful in defending this point because the threat doesn't scale.

The NSA can't hire enough heavies to break fingers of every person sending and receiving encrypted data (assuming they could even find the people sending and receiving it without first decrypting).

Could be a new jobs program.

The difference is, if the assumptions/reassurances about the math/crypto/physics hold, I can be _reasonably_ sure that if they haven't broken my fingers or hit me with a wrench, they've probably not read my email/files. That knowledge of whether they have or haven't "broken my crypto" is of value.

So you're saying: don't force the NSA to get a court order and force you to reveal the unencrypted data, just hand it over to them now so they can look at it any time they want?

Only if you care about your fingers.

At this point, no one has to worry about that if they aren't being individually targeted. I think most people just want to avoid being sucked up in a dragnet along with everyone else and having their communications permanently on record.

HTTPS with perfect forward secrecy is passwordless :P Right?

True, but that only applies to data in flight. For everything you want to store and look at again you better have a key - otherwise you could just delete everything and arrive at essentially the same result.

All perfectly true, but you've at least made it a bit harder for someone to break your encryption without your knowledge and monitor your communications on an ongoing basis.

AKA "rubber hose cryptanalysis".