Re:What's up, bot? Google tries new Captcha method
by henning on Saturday April 18, 2009 @03:32PM
(#568640)
Is that really effective? Just take some face detection code and have it learn what cat fur looks like instead.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What's up, bot? Google tries new Captcha method
by amix on Saturday April 18, 2009 @05:33PM
(#568765)
It's ok effective judging by my usages and I could just iterate over this solution if someone brute forced it or implemented a "cat fur detector" (which for my uses is pretty unrealistic).
Battling spammers is really a battle where you implement better protections and they implement better attacks. The conclusion so far has been that it isn't possible to check-mate them - - and it's very unlikely it will ever happen as a lot of spammers use "human bots"...
Using visual captcha is much more user friendly thought, so it's a win for the users.
Re:What's up, bot? Google tries new Captcha method
by stevenrace on Sunday April 19, 2009 @02:11AM
(#569155)
There is actually a 'Google Tech Talk' on detecting cats (versus other shapes) from images:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w72_VwSj6A
Is it really that easy? I would think flagging for texture would be difficult, as it's
likely indistinguishable from noise (data, shadows, clothing..). Approximating shape/avg.
contour is likely easier than looking for fur patterns.
Any suggestions on books/papers/etc on image recognition?