News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku? by pearkes on Friday April 26, 2013 @02:26AM (#5611748)
> giving you more control over your instances and the ability to SSH into them.

FWIW you can do:

    heroku run bash
Which let's you mess around on a new dyno (not an existing one).
Re:Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku? by edanm on Friday April 26, 2013 @03:46AM (#5611889)
Didn't know about this. What's the difference between a new dyno and an existing one? Why would they act differently?
Re:Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku? by ncrit on Friday April 26, 2013 @04:48AM (#5612022)
They don't act differently, its just a dyno separate from the web and other processes.
Re:Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku? by acjohnson55 on Friday April 26, 2013 @01:07PM (#5614021)
That's good for things that change shared state, but you can't do anything that would alter a running dyno or interrogate its state, unless you built your own hooks or something. But building something like that would kind of obviate the perks of a NoOps system.
Re:Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku? by vishal0123 on Friday April 26, 2013 @04:19AM (#5611955)
The changes you made by running 'heroku run bash' is temporary and can be reverted any time.
Re:Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku? by fabiokung on Friday April 26, 2013 @05:06PM (#5615496)
`heroku run bash` is still the best option, but I've always wanted to ssh into heroku dynos myself, so I did this:

https://github.com/fabiokung/heroku-ssh