Didn't know about this. What's the difference between a new dyno and an existing one? Why would they act differently?
They don't act differently, its just a dyno separate from the web and other processes.
Re:Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
by acjohnson55 on Friday April 26, 2013 @01:07PM
(#5614021)
That's good for things that change shared state, but you can't do anything that would alter a running dyno or interrogate its state, unless you built your own hooks or something. But building something like that would kind of obviate the perks of a NoOps system.
Re:Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku?
by vishal0123 on Friday April 26, 2013 @04:19AM
(#5611955)
The changes you made by running 'heroku run bash' is temporary and can be reverted any time.
`heroku run bash` is still the best option, but I've always wanted to ssh into heroku dynos myself, so I did this:
FWIW you can do:
Which let's you mess around on a new dyno (not an existing one).