News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

fabiokung

Re:Docker container breakout? on Wednesday June 18, 2014 @04:45PM (#7912741)
Great response.

"..., or ideally don't grant root access to the application."

+1

Re:Memory inside Linux containers on Friday March 14, 2014 @03:26PM (#7401174)
It's possible, but only part of a possible solution. Those tools still would need a (standard) place to read cgroup specific data from inside the container.
Re:New Dyno Networking Model on Thursday May 02, 2013 @04:15PM (#5646927)
Heroku engineer here. Thanks for the suggestion, we will definitely consider it in the future.

Meanwhile, there is an add-on that does exactly this: https://addons.heroku.com/proximo

Re:New Dyno Networking Model on Thursday May 02, 2013 @04:10PM (#5646902)
It is still abstracted, nothing changes from the point of view of most applications.

It just opens more possibilities and increases the isolation.

Re:New Dyno Networking Model on Thursday May 02, 2013 @04:09PM (#5646898)
Not all services support unix domain sockets. It's one more option on the table, but I agree that domain sockets should be favored in most cases.
Re:Ask HN: Best alternative to Heroku? on Friday April 26, 2013 @05:06PM (#5615496)
`heroku run bash` is still the best option, but I've always wanted to ssh into heroku dynos myself, so I did this:

https://github.com/fabiokung/heroku-ssh