acjohnson55
I also always felt that the Touchbar would have been a much better idea on the bottom of the screen, rather than on my keyboard.
There are certainly many ways of using coding agents, but the way he describes it is not my approach. There's a huge amount of direction and feedback.
I don't know if I'd call it a tool so much as a modality of building software. Within the modality, you have everything from truly unsupervised YOLO coding to something far more structured. To an extent, it's similar to how you go about setting up standard operating procedures to get teams of humans to do work at scale.
But gradually, things got better in my life. I have had so much joy in the 20 years since. I still have bad days sometimes, but on the whole, I feel such a sense of gratitude.
I can't promise anyone that their own situation will get better. I can only say that my experience is that it is possible.
I agree that the potential is enormous, but I'm not sure why it would be Typesafe who figures out the best way to develop and package this capability. They have a bit of an advantage in the amount of time they have been thinking about this problem specifically, but I think it's a big leap to say that they will be able to dominate the category.
Look into:
- the Mau Mau in Kenya (https://radiolab.org/podcast/mau-mau)
- prerevolutionary Haitian society from the Black Jacobins by CLR James (https://politicaleducation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CL...)
- what King Leopold of Belgium did to the Congo
- what happened to Rapa Nui (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCyzrie_les)
- Heart of Darkness on British imperialism in the Congo
The cost of the socio-economic mobility provided to lower classes in colonizing societies was absolutely staggering. Unimaginable cruelty, suffering and destruction was visited upon the native populations.
That's generally not how colonization worked. Quite often, colonization intentionally created the large scale tribal identities. Allegiance to clans grows because of deep suspicion of extractive governments put in place by outsiders.
Eventually, we get a Europe united under Christianity, but I wouldn't call that fully developed until the end of the Viking age.
David Sacks holds an advisory role in the government. If all of this stuff goes belly up and all he was doing was tweeting, then he is not only full of crap, but failing the citizens he's supposed to be serving.
It's the culmination of years spent chasing an explanation of where all this stuff came from.
Highly informed by Tymoczko, who was mentioned in a sibling reply, and a bunch of other thinkers on the topic.
One of my favorite memories was when I was discussing my first semester schedule with him. I was interested in taking a high level signal processing course. I asked him if that was OK, considering I had never taken the prerequisites.
He laughed and responded, "if we accepted you to this program, it's because we thought you can do pretty much whatever you want. So maybe you'll want to go to the library and read a textbook, but sure, you can do it."
And so I did. It was tough, but I pulled it off, and it taught me I had a gear I never had to exercise up until that point.
He was a great guy.
Although, I must admit, as a doomer, I'm pleasantly surprised things aren't already worse than they are.
Bending Spoons makes first post-IPO acquisition with $1.3B Airtable deal
Centuries before we had major and minor tonality, we had the diatonic scale.
Through the Renaissance, thirds began to be accepted as stable consonances, and from that, you get tertian chords (triads and seventh chords from stacked thirds, and their inversions). In the diatonic scale, you only have 3 types of tertian triad: 3 major, 3 minor, and 1 diminished. The diminished triad was not accepted as a stable consonance.
In another post, I summarize the history of the development of major tonality out of the convention of the authentic cadence: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49095594
I have come to believe that minor tonality is quite simply a result of "what if we used a minor chord as the tonic, instead?" Note that the minor chord already existed and had been in use for quite some time. The conventions of minor tonality (the tonal use of Aeolian and Dorian modes, minor key signature, the raised seventh degree, relative and paralellel key conventions, etc), however, developed as a contrast to major tonality.
I'm not discounting your neurological explanation, I haven't read your whole paper yet, but just pointing towards historical contingency as another way to see it.
Harmony is derived from composing music with multiple melodic parts. This is most obvious with counterpoint, but even pop/rock music can be seen this way. The essence of pop/rock is a melody and bass line as the two primary parts, and the rest of the instrumentation often plays harmonies that imply inner voices.
The transitional period where this happened is roughly in the 1600s.
It's a challenging read, but extremely thorough and enlightening. Tymoczko wrote a follow up that extends and reformulates his theories, but I haven't gotten through it yet.
But hopefully I'll get around to reading this at some point. It's one of my favorite topics. I wrote up my own attempt to explain the Western music system here: https://fakestoryofmusic.com
I've also been working on something smaller that focuses on major/minor tonality, specifically. But it's further from being in a place where I want to share it.