News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stocks Plunge, Quickly Recover, on Fake Tweet by cube13 on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @01:51PM (#5596747)
The "Plunge" was a 1% drop in the DJI average.

Concerning, sure, but not nearly as huge as the graphs make it out to be.

Re:Stocks Plunge, Quickly Recover, on Fake Tweet by Rimpinths on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @02:48PM (#5597145)
It was a pretty big deal. I ran some queries against some intraday data of a proprietary market index (kind of a cross between the S&P 500 and Russell 2000) and it was the biggest one minute drop (at -0.56%) that I found within the past year.

For comparison, here are the top 5 that I found since 4/23/12:

(1) 4/23/13 @ 13:10: -0.56% (2) 8/1/12 @ 14:14: -0.45% (3) 11/29/12 @ 11:41: -0.44% (4) 6/20/12 @ 12:33: -0.38% (5) 12/31/12 @ 13:47: -0.35%

As best as I can tell from the news on those days, (2) and (4) were related to Fed announcements and (3) and (5) were related to the fiscal cliff.

Re:Stocks Plunge, Quickly Recover, on Fake Tweet by cube13 on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @03:10PM (#5597278)
I agree that it's a big deal. But I think a lot of people are reacting to the images of the graphs, not to the actual numbers that the graphs represent.
Re:Stocks Plunge, Quickly Recover, on Fake Tweet by jacquesm on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @02:22PM (#5596958)
If you could repeat that trick it would be a bit like a combustion engine. Every individual explosion doesn't amount to much in terms of force but a long sequence will get your car up to speed quite nicely.
Re:Stocks Plunge, Quickly Recover, on Fake Tweet by brown9-2 on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @02:04PM (#5596839)
Re:Stocks Plunge, Quickly Recover, on Fake Tweet by mmanfrin on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @02:03PM (#5596834)
1% is huge.
Re:Stocks Plunge, Quickly Recover, on Fake Tweet by tedsanders on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @02:23PM (#5596960)
1% is huge in an absolute sense, but small in the impact it has on any one person. And small relative to some other news-driven price changes. Fair?