News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why I'll never work on First-Person Shooters again by obviouslygreen on Saturday April 20, 2013 @02:54PM (#5582413)
All of those things can also be totally valid parts of a well-told story. Not only that, any historically significant factual account of human beings is likely to contain at least one and probably more of those things.

Yes, only using those things, or using them to prop up otherwise poor writing, is most certainly a crutch. But generalizing that too far takes very significant parts of our nature and behavior -- for better or worse -- and casts them in an artificially negative light as invalid literary mechanics.

Re:Why I'll never work on First-Person Shooters again by pfg on Saturday April 20, 2013 @03:07PM (#5582452)
Totally agree. This is what I keep telling people whenever they moan about Game Of Thrones/A Song Of Ice And Fire being porn and/or too violent.
Re:Why I'll never work on First-Person Shooters again by michaelochurch on Saturday April 20, 2013 @04:17PM (#5582652)
Excellent point. Those books also get into a lot of detail about medieval food and clothing. He's just very detailed and realistic. (I almost think of IaF as magical realism, not fantasy.)
Re:Why I'll never work on First-Person Shooters again by Snoptic on Monday April 22, 2013 @10:11AM (#5589285)
The TV show does have meaningless porn dumped on top to keep the audience interested. That is HBO's trademark.