Re:Show HN: TheBigDB - A simpler open database of facts
by JPKab on Thursday April 04, 2013 @01:24PM
(#5493849)
I apologize for calling your project stupid. I should not have done that. I'm interested in seeing what you are doing on context. Thanks for being classy.
Re:Show HN: TheBigDB - A simpler open database of facts
by christophe971 on Thursday April 04, 2013 @01:38PM
(#5493957)
No problem, I'm not afraid of criticism and insults, there is always some kind of information in them :)
Re:Show HN: TheBigDB - A simpler open database of facts
by barakm on Thursday April 04, 2013 @01:40PM
(#5493964)
When you start assigning context to statments, you'll quickly find yourself walking down the path to structured data, and toward the very complexity you're arguing against. At least predicate-wise.
You'll then need to start assigning contexts to entities, at which point you're right about where Freebase begins, in principle. Even if we assume you use Wikipedia-esque strings like "Apple (company)"
Triples are easy. Semantics are hard.
Re:Show HN: TheBigDB - A simpler open database of facts
by christophe971 on Thursday April 04, 2013 @01:44PM
(#5494001)
Yes, whatever I do is making me "walking down the path to structured data, and toward the very complexity you're arguing against", that's why it is done in a way where those principles are still preserved.
I don't want to talk too much about a structure that I haven't released yet, but let me assure you there's a way that doesn't end up where Freebase is. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.</seinfeld>)
It will be released when it will be the right time for it. Thanks for your comment!