News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Kiln. Parent comment

Re:Kiln by alexgartrell on Sunday March 31, 2013 @08:02PM (#5470724)
My first reaction when I saw this submission was "Holy shit, who leaked kiln?"
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kiln by mpyne on Sunday March 31, 2013 @09:48PM (#5471017)
Mine was similar, if a little less cynical: "Holy shit, Fog Creek is open-sourcing Kiln? On April Fool's Day?"
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kiln by spicyj on Sunday March 31, 2013 @11:33PM (#5471273)
Would they really host it on GitHub? :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kiln by mpyne on Monday April 01, 2013 @09:01AM (#5472742)
Ooh, good point. Though one issue I've noticed popping up of late is that people are starting to associate "open source" with "GitHub" instead of with checking whether the source is open or not. So who knows, maybe a GitHub mirror of their own Kiln-hosted source for April Fool's?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kiln by SkyMarshal on Monday April 01, 2013 @12:57PM (#5474291)
On April 1st, absolutely.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kiln by pnathan on Sunday March 31, 2013 @08:29PM (#5470801)
Yeah, that was my reaction as well. Kiln == Fog Creek's hg server in my head.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kiln by manojlds on Monday April 01, 2013 @01:14AM (#5471577)
It is now a git and hg server all at the same time.
[ Parent | on HN ]