Why am I so confident it'll actually work? Canonical has done a great job for many years on managing the sprawling world of integrating multiple upstream OSS projects that weren't under its control.
That's just a totally different thing from how you manage the development and integration of commercial software. What Canonical has done is much, much harder. And in my view, people who have done that can do anything -- beginning with the long-term technology planning, partnership building, and platform integration work that their vision requires.
That vision, by the way, is I think one that most of us want: 1) a 'smart device' OS, suitable for many hardware channels 2) a desktop OS tuned for content creation and collaboration 3) open cloud infrastructure to provide services to 1 and 2
For me, the single most important outcome of this vision is using Ubuntu to drive an educational revolution in the developing world. That requires Ubuntu to be in the hands of a wide and diverse community of developers, educators, scientists, engineers, artists, artisans, activists, policymakers, and hobbyists interested in such things, and who have total freedom to hack them.
That will not happen if "Linux" still means your dad's 90s desktop OS.
Go Shuttleworth!
Actually, I don't see that at all. Where's the marketing initiative? Where's the retail channel? Where's the Linux Genius Bar/Geek Squad? Who really desires/wants/needs Linux and why can't they obtain it?
This is all Open Source development politics where nerds project their prejudicial ideas of what "normal people" want in some sort of bizarre appeal to popularity. None of this is backed up by serious UI research. None of this is actually trying to solve a real market problem, even assuming they had the resources to do so.
Eventually, I hope that people will let Linux be Linux. It should be just an environment focused on the needs of Programmers and Free-Software lovers. It should stop trying to be a totally baseless appeal to the "the masses".
http://doctormo.org/2013/03/06/ubuntu-membership-2/
And here some the many responses in the past two days (remember, these are Ubuntu members, not random users), many of them agree that there's something wrong with the Ubuntu community of contributors:
http://randall.executiv.es/ubuntu-stage-next
http://blog.pault.ag/post/44821301540/ubuntu-the-community
http://www.jonobacon.org/2013/03/08/thoughts-on-recent-commu...
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1235
http://apachelog.wordpress.com/2013/03/07/divisive-leadershi...
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1232
http://smartboyhw.tk/wordpress_smartboyhw/?p=28
http://linuxgrandma.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/thoughts-and-worr...
http://philipballew.wordpress.com/2013/03/07/confessions-of-...
http://princessleia.com/journal/?p=7670
http://ftbeowulf.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/freedom-and-commun...
What a massively backhanded insult. Yet also a tragically true statement.
The world is flying towards Sim City always on DRM with open arms, and mark shuttleworth wants to lead the charge? Fine. Coddled computing for everyone.
For god sakes, A pox on the people who actually choose to use Amazon Linux.
I really don't see how it could be worse than being stuck in X11-land though.
Sure, Wayland may(or may not) end up even better. But why should I care, as long as there is a great improvement to the current situation?
Some people were OK with it, some people weren't, then all of a sudden ubuntu goes and makes a THIRD standard, citing a laundry list of nonsense reasons to abandon all that work. We know the reason they did it, it's the same reason they made that ridiculous unity DE. They want control.
That doesn't mean I can't complain about the stink.
Where will we be when Amazon et al start leaning more heavily on Canonical for more invasive features? What recourse will the existing user-base have other than being callously told to "fuck off if you don't like it, or buy some lube and start grabbing your ankles"?
You'll be on a different Linux distro.
It's not like "community-driven Linux distribution" is such a badge of honor.
I can absolutely understand the blowback to his sentiments, because really, the diversity of use and mindset in the Linux community is one of its defining characteristics. But frankly, he's right -- if Ubuntu isn't the platform you're looking for, either go find the one that is, or start it.
I don't see Shuttleworth's stance, or indeed the negative feedback from a vocally inflamed (though not majority) userbase, as a sign of Ubuntu's decline. I see it as Ubuntu finally having the balls to do what no other desktop Linux platform has done before -- move ahead with their grand vision on bringing free software to the masses, not just the ones that demand it the most.