News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by brown9-2 on Monday March 04, 2013 @01:50PM (#5319835)
What outcome would you have been happier with? The executive branch cannot pass legislation.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by kyllo on Monday March 04, 2013 @02:00PM (#5319933)
It can't pass legislation, but it can issue an executive order. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order

However, an exec order for cell phone unlocking would be a tremendous waste of political capital.

Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by brown9-2 on Monday March 04, 2013 @02:07PM (#5320008)
An executive order would also probably be a waste of time because it is irrelevant; the FCC is an independent agency and not directly overseen by the Executive Branch. The President appoints commissioners but Congress has to approve them and they do not report to him/her.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by cube13 on Monday March 04, 2013 @02:21PM (#5320154)
And more importantly, an executive order can be ignored by any subsequent presidency. This change needs to be in law for it to have any teeth.

Unfortunately, that kind of stuff takes time.

Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by Cushman on Monday March 04, 2013 @02:04PM (#5319971)
And probably illegal, since the LoC was explicitly given this power by Congress.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by iy56 on Monday March 04, 2013 @01:57PM (#5319904)
Refuse to enforce this clause of the DMCA and pardon anyone imprisoned because of it.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by dyno12345 on Monday March 04, 2013 @02:07PM (#5320000)
Has this actually been enforced against anyone so far?
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by AnthonyMouse on Monday March 04, 2013 @04:54PM (#5321257)
Whether it actually gets enforced doesn't matter, what matters whether people refrain from engaging in the activity (or aiding others in doing so) because of the risk that it could be.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by dyno12345 on Monday March 04, 2013 @07:45PM (#5322108)
There's always that risk with unenforced laws - there's hardly ever (ever?) a stated policy of non-enforcement, since the executive is also technically obliged to enforce everything congress has told it to.

I would generally be interested to know if it ever has actually been enforced so far.

Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by AnthonyMouse on Monday March 04, 2013 @10:31PM (#5322712)
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by dyno12345 on Tuesday March 05, 2013 @12:51AM (#5323143)
Those are civil suits - not criminal enforcement that the administration could choose to pursue or not
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by AnthonyMouse on Tuesday March 05, 2013 @01:01AM (#5323175)
Sklyarov was arrested.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by dyno12345 on Tuesday March 05, 2013 @01:10PM (#5326221)
Is that the part of the DMCA we're talking about here?