Part 1: http://cybernonsense.blogspot.com/2013/02/chinese-hackers-an...
Part 2: http://cybernonsense.blogspot.com/2013/02/chinese-hackers-an...
Part 3: http://cybernonsense.blogspot.com/2013/02/chinese-hackers-an...
EDIT: Updated to include links to all three parts
The way those posts are written with personal attacks against particular people I wouldn't be surprised if it was written by somebody at a competing firm.
"Investigators say the surge of malware attacks on U.S. companies may be coming from Eastern European cybercriminals rather than being Chinese state-sponsored espionage."
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57570194-83/apple-facebook-...
I opened the provided link, read a few paragraphs, scanned the rest of the post, and decided that the post does not contain a complete thought. In my opinion part III (the linked part) is substantially worse than parts I and II and the OP does a severe dis-service by linking the third part directly.
Additionally the math flagged my BS detector, which doesnt say the rest is wrong, but makes me even more wary since this is the only part i have enough facts about to make a complete decision on:
| The breakdown per minute at this pace equals 396 megabytes per minute 6.6 megabytes per second to pull this off non-stop for 10 months straight.
And of course Mandiant's not just releasing this information for fun. Chinese hacking is big business for them. Brad Stone and Michael Riley reported earlier this month for Businessweek that Mandiant's 2012 revenue of more than $100 million represented a 76 percent year-on-year increase. They say they represent 30 percent of the Fortune 100. Mandiant is so dominant in the China-focused counter-espionage game that the New York Times' reporting on the Mandiant report and other sources of information abotu Chinese hacking had to include an awkward disclaimer
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/02/19/mandiant_is_t...