News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Short Rant About Working Remotely by adrianhoward on Thursday January 31, 2013 @12:21PM (#5146024)
* I'm willing to bet that most of those studies looked at what happens when you take some "on-site" positions and simply hand them to remote team members.*

You'd lose that bet. There are a variety of different methodologies and areas studied.

Companies that embrace remoteness from the start (like GitHub) seem to be doing fine, precisely because they treat remoteness as an asses, not a minor concession someone had to make to workers.

Again - not trying to argue at all that people cannot be fantastically successful as a distributed team.

What I am saying is that every single piece of research I can find says that colocated teams are more effective. This is... interesting... to me.

Re:A Short Rant About Working Remotely by numbsafari on Thursday January 31, 2013 @01:29PM (#5146462)
How much of that research includes open source projects and companies like GitHub and 37signals?

How much of it was looking at teams that are "super distributed", for example, between the US and India, where major differences in time and culture can play a huge role compared to say, a team distributed between Chicago and New York?

Re:A Short Rant About Working Remotely by romaniv on Thursday January 31, 2013 @03:48PM (#5147358)
These two seem to fall into the category I described:

http://possibility.com/Misc/p339-teasley.pdf

http://kraut.hciresearch.org/sites/kraut.hciresearch.org/fil...

This one does not seem to involve developing software:

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjourna...

Remaining two articles are not publicly accessible.