Why are you so quick to condemn someone based on publications with "anonymous sources" or no sources at all? Just grow up man. The media just makes up facts all the time.

> You're also misrepresenting statements, "unsure" does not mean "no".

The Democrat came out of the intelligence briefing and in the hallway he was asked whether Alice is a spy and he said he doesn't know. Does it sound to you like strong evidence was presented to him? Does it sound like he saw irrefutable facts? Think logically.

> I'm just pointing out that dismissals from a few untrustworthy individuals

Singaporean Government came out and clearly said WSJ made up facts. Both the Republicans and Democrats are saying they haven't see convincing evidence. You still prefer to believe WSJ/NYT/Economist based on "anonymous sources"?

Do you lack critical thinking at all?