extraextra

So far you're just trying to move the goalpost on multiple points and to substitute legal principles with your feelings basically.

> Trump was banned for more Tweets that Twitter judged

We were discussing Meta, why are we moving the goalpost?

> Private platforms [can do whatever they want]

That applies to Trump as much as it applies here.

> “Not convicted” != “no legal basis”

Lol, have you even heard of "innocent until proven guilty"? How about "defamation"?

So much artificial intelligence, yet we struggle with basic concepts.

> Trump was deplatformed for [commenter's opinion]

Yeah, that's your opinion.

> if you can point to a case of leftists complaining that their candidate was deplatformed for [commenter's opinion]

Again, that's your opinion, not a fact. Plus, you're trying to move the goalpost again.

> annual meltdown about the decorations on Starbucks cups

That's actually funny haha

> my side

That's were we have the real problem. "My side" vs. "your side". "I'm morally superior because [commenter's opinion]".

I literally argue that censorship is bad for everyone and people are ready to wage WW3 because of "sides".

The video for which Trump was deplatformed is literally a video in which he calls for peace and asks protesters to go home, and by the way, he was never convicted of anything (despite Biden's best efforts on the matter), so your accusation has no legal basis

As far as facts go, here's what's established: Trump was deplatformed for political speech for 2 years

Leftist cheer on the politically-motivated censorship of the other side, and then when Dem account is banned 1 hour and everyone is crying their eyes out

The audacity

People are too emotionally invested in their side to care about any principles unfortunately

Freedom of speech? We don't want that for the "other side"

Censorship? Yes please, but only for the "other side"

Arguing in bad faith? Anything just to make the "other side" look unflattering

Yeah, they're not the same thing, DT was treated much much worse

Trump was banned for years and that seems to be ok with you

A Dem account is banned 1 hour and people here are crying wolf

How do you get the malware on the machine in the first place if it's air-gapped?

If you can get the malware on the machine and physical access, do you even need this sophisticated attack?

It's hard for me to imagine a scenario where all this is practical

Same, can't open on Firefox

You haven't presented any facts or arguments, are you here just for an emotional conversation?

Perhaps your therapist was in vacation this week and need to vent out some feelings?

That's nonsense

You're clearly not informed here

He posted a benign video and the woke people running social media companies used that opportunity to retaliate

It was clearly a cheap shot for his political speech and political views

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” - George Orwell

The article is a bit old from 2020, but I like it's brevity. Scott's quote, which is the centerpiece, is golden.

Since the article was written, this quote was proven right once again[1], with the valuations of the high-flying software companies coming down once on the "SaaSpocalypse" came along with the AI revolution.

I thought it's worth pondering on those words, with the new wave of IPOs coming to the market.

[1] https://www.saas-capital.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/SaaS...

Orwell is turning in his grave hearing all the leftist nonsense spewed out nowadays

True

People that were cheering on when this happened to one side suddenly get surprised when the same thing happens to their side

Well well well how the turntables... [1]

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFagogEOZz8

Let me fix that for you: "If you think Zuck has loyalties then you are blind and willingly ignorant"

Much better

Trump was banned in middle of 2021, for a full year and a half before the midterms of 2022

Now that's a real attempt to silence someone's political speech into obscurity

Clearly much much worse

Yeah, they're not symmetrical, DT was treated much much worse

Trump was banned for years and that seems to be ok with you

A Dem account is banned 1 hour and you cry wolf

> Lets compare the reasons and speeches rather then hiding behind "political" euphemism.

Lol here comes the thought police

Lol what a hypocritical thing to say

Trump was banned for years and that seems to be ok with you

A Dem account is banned 1 hour and you cry wolf

The audacity

Lol what a hypocritical way to spin things

Trump was banned for years and that seems to be ok with you

A Dem account is banned 1 hour and you cry wolf "the mask has come off"

The audacity

For political speech

And Trump was banned for multiple years, this Dem account was blocked 1 hour and people are already crying wolf

The examples you give are more than 15 years old.

Somehow you believe that evidence that's more than 15 years old should take precedence to what happened after that? Biden's term ended less than 20 months ago, I think that's far far more relevant.

My claim is very well proven by the most recent data, you keep insisting you want some sort of official statement "we the Dems want at least 30 million more illegal immigrants". Even other leftist that commented here agree with me that the numbers look bad for the Dems.

As I said, numbers and facts speak for themselves. You keep claiming "tHaT dOeSn'T pRoVe AnYtHiNg", which is funny. Shows you're brainwashed.

Your logic is basically "someone that rapes women without officially declaring he's a rapist, is not really a rapist, because he didn't officially declare it".

Lol, let's not forget Meta banned Donald Trump, Marjorie Taylor Greene and others before

You pretend like this is somehow a partisan issue

Lol, let's not forget Meta banned Donald Trump, Marjorie Taylor Greene and others before

You pretend like this is somehow a partisan issue

Donald Trump

Marjorie Taylor Greene

And others

Same Trump he banned a few years ago?

Lol what "loyalty" are you talking about?

Let's not forget that Trump was banned as well by Meta

Funniest thing I read all day, thanks

Ad hominem

God I hate those

I see you gave up completely on arguing the facts of the matter and you're just focusing on the semantics of a hyperbole, which is funny.

Anyway, my larger point was proven by the numbers and still stands. You conceded that Biden's immigration numbers are awful and then came with with some logical contortion that basically said "someone that rapes women without officially declaring he's a rapist, is not really a rapist, because he didn't officially declare it" (if I may use another hyperbole). Someone has to be really brainwashed to believe what you're saying. Border enforcement does not need special legislation, any Administration can just do it if they actually want to.

"the discussion was about flying payloads to space for third parties (including NASA), not about flying people specifically"

Which part of this did you miss?

> at least not without some fundamental changes

When did design iterations become illegal?